> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:23, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > > In the last months it is the second time I hear people > complaining the > > current monitoring solution in OFA is integrated with OpenSM. > > I must have missed this both times (didn't see this in Mark's > post) and the statement itself is somewhat inaccurate as well. Private talks - I hope they will speak up for themselves now... > > > These people do not use OpenSM but do use OFED. > > I'm not sure I'm following what you mean here. > > If you mean that some people want to run PerfMgr without the > SM/SA aspects (so that they can run a vendor based SM), that > is the next thing we are adding to the implementation. Exactly. OK when is that coming? > > > Another drawback if that > > no naming is provided and the reporting uses GUIDs. > > Naming is provided via NodeDescription. This might be good for hosts but is not covering switches ... > > > I also can't hold myself from saying again I think you are going to > > hit the wall with the concept of doing the PMA from a single node. > > If you are referring to the fact the PerMgr is currently not > distributed, that will be done as has been stated before. Good. When is it expected? Will it be OFED 1.3?
Thanks > > -- Hal > > > Eitan Zahavi > > Senior Engineering Director, Software Architect Mellanox > Technologies > > LTD > > Tel:+972-4-9097208 > > Fax:+972-4-9593245 > > P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal > > > Rosenstock > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 8:12 PM > > > To: Mark Seger > > > Cc: Finn, Ed; [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [ofa-general] IB performance stats (revisited) > > > > > > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 13:07, Mark Seger wrote: > > > > >The performance managers deal with the counter stickiness (by > > > > >resetting them when they think they need to). They > > > typically export > > > > >their data although this is not specified by IBA so it is > > > in a vendor > > > > >proprietary manner. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so I guess these guys are poor citizens as well... > > > > > > Not sure what you mean. > > > > > > > the real issue as I see it then means nobody can trust > the data if > > > > randon tools randomly reset the counters. a real shame... > > > > > > I consider this to be a real rather than random app for this. > > > Guess it depends on what one considers random. > > > > > > -- Hal > > > > > > > -mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > general mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > > To unsubscribe, please visit > > > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > > > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
