Tziporet Koren wrote:
Or Gerlitz wrote:
Dror did not mention the HW, my understanding is that this aspect is
fine... now, assuming the need for liveness protocol is behind us, and
if not, it can be implemented as you suggested. the problem is
narrowed to have the FW support SRQ/UC.
We still don't have a solid plan for this in the FW
The current implementation of IPoIB-CM uses RC, where Michael has
admitted that the RC ACKs are actually used as keep alives, no more.
-> under high packet rate there are some ten (hundred?!) --thousands--
keep alive messages/second.
This is --very-- poor architecture, the code must move to UC.
The only actual barrier here is FW support for UC/SRQ, the IBTA
signature can come later (and is on its way).
Or.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
