Hi Sasha
Discovered a bug in coding of the VL Arbitration table "index".
According to spec should be:
1 for low part of low table
2 for high part of low table
3 for low part of high table
4 for high part of high table
the patch below fixes it:
Eitan
Signed-off-by: Eitan Zahavi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
index bbb1608..413e200 100644
--- a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
+++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
@@ -116,14 +116,14 @@ static ib_api_status_t vlarb_update(osm_req_t * p_req,
p_pi->vl_arb_low_cap : IB_NUM_VL_ARB_ELEMENTS_IN_BLOCK;
if ((status = vlarb_update_table_block(p_req, p, port_num,
&qcfg->vlarb_low[0],
- len, 0)) != IB_SUCCESS)
+ len, 1)) != IB_SUCCESS)
return status;
}
if (p_pi->vl_arb_low_cap > IB_NUM_VL_ARB_ELEMENTS_IN_BLOCK) {
len = p_pi->vl_arb_low_cap % IB_NUM_VL_ARB_ELEMENTS_IN_BLOCK;
if ((status = vlarb_update_table_block(p_req, p, port_num,
&qcfg->vlarb_low[1],
- len, 1)) != IB_SUCCESS)
+ len, 2)) != IB_SUCCESS)
return status;
}
if (p_pi->vl_arb_high_cap > 0) {
@@ -131,14 +131,14 @@ static ib_api_status_t vlarb_update(osm_req_t * p_req,
p_pi->vl_arb_high_cap : IB_NUM_VL_ARB_ELEMENTS_IN_BLOCK;
if ((status = vlarb_update_table_block(p_req, p, port_num,
&qcfg->vlarb_high[0],
- len, 2)) != IB_SUCCESS)
+ len, 3)) != IB_SUCCESS)
return status;
}
if (p_pi->vl_arb_high_cap > IB_NUM_VL_ARB_ELEMENTS_IN_BLOCK) {
len = p_pi->vl_arb_high_cap % IB_NUM_VL_ARB_ELEMENTS_IN_BLOCK;
if ((status = vlarb_update_table_block(p_req, p, port_num,
&qcfg->vlarb_high[1],
- len, 3)) != IB_SUCCESS)
+ len, 4)) != IB_SUCCESS)
return status;
}
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
