On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:58:18AM +0300, Erez Zilber wrote: [...]
> I guess that you meant that you're using only the UNH iSCSI target > (because the iSER initiator should be used with open-iscsi). Well, we are actually using both initiator and target. We grabed an older version of the datamover implementation from the open-iser-target project and are fitting it to work with both the UNH-iSCSI target and initiator. After we get this working, we would like to try and interop with the open-iscsi implementation. This is why I was concerned about the header. > Will you send patches for iSER soon? I'd like to test it, and make sure > that iSER over IB is not damaged. Our patches may not interest you since we are using an older version of the iSER code. However, we will also be exploring the use of IB with our implementations. Will this require us to use the same non-standard iSER header in some cases? Thanks for your help, Ethan _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
