Hi Hal, Good idea !
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sasha Khapyorsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 12:11 AM > To: Hal Rosenstock > Cc: OpenFabrics General; Eitan Zahavi; Yevgeny Kliteynik > Subject: Re: osm_physp_calc_link_ops question > > Hi Hal, > > On 13:53 Wed 25 Jul , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > Both osm_lid_mgr.c:__osm_lid_mgr_set_physp_pi and > > osm_link_mgr.c:__osm_link_mgr_set_physp_pi call > > osm_port.c:osm_physp_calc_link_op_vls. In the case where the remote > > end is invalid, the local VLCap is used as the > OperationalVLs. When > > the VLCaps at the two ends of the link do not match, this is not a > > good thing. It causes trap storms on the flow control > watchdog timer > > expiring. Wouldn't it be better to leave this field as is in this > > case or would that cause some other problem ? > > > > Same thing might also be true for link MTU but not as critical. > > Looks like good idea for me. Would you care about patch? > > Sasha > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
