> On 14:27 Fri 27 Jul , Eitan Zahavi wrote: > > The problem I have with back-to-back plug is that it is a > fatal case > > if found in a case where there was no use of this plug. > > So we will need some sort of user input if it is OK or not. > > Ok, and let's add cl_qmap_count() check there. Not following you. > > > The case of moving a port in the middle of a sweep can be easily > > detected if instead of reporting an error a second check of the > > original DR where the same GUID was found is performed... > > Do you mean to resend NodeInfo request to the original location? > Assuming so, I guess it should be instead of second heavy > sweep, and it is a good idea. The only small downside of this > I can see is potential timeouts (and discovery slowdown). But > anyway it is much better then fatal error. Thanks!
So we are inline with this one . Instead of changing the order of things we could generate list of DR's that are to be re-scanned during drop-mgr and then abort if really dulicates. > > Sasha > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
