On 8/13/07, Sasha Khapyorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Hal, > > On 09:19 Mon 13 Aug , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > On 8/12/07, Sasha Khapyorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyway OpenSM will request resweep when there are suspected nodes > > > with duplicate GUID on the subnet. And because we cannot be 100% sure > > > that detected GUIDs duplication is not some corner case of port moving > > > I prefer to not exit. Endless (re)discovery and syslog messages should > > > be good indication if it is indeed this case. > > > > Couldn't there be some duplication state kept per GUID so the messages > > only get logged on change of state to duplicated rather than > > continually spewing into the log ? > > There should be one message per duplicated GUID in the sweep. The sweep > will be repeated and in the case of real duplication the message will > appear again - so it is per sweep. I hope it is not too much.
Once per sweep is too much IMO. It still fills the log over time. > Sasha > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
