> the calculation looks ok, but it looks to me like > the && should be an || in the test, esp since earlier > in the routine, we do an: > > if (!can_do_mlock()) > return ERR_PTR(-EPERM); > > so, maybe the !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK) should not be > there at all?
No, I think the code is correct. CAP_IPC_LOCK basically means we are root and should ignore resource limits. You can compare against the code in sys_mlock() to see that it has exactly the same logic. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
