Now I get you. OK we will add this info about IPoIB CM to the RFC. Eitan Zahavi
> -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:42 PM > To: Michael S. Tsirkin > Cc: Eitan Zahavi; Yevgeny Kliteynik; OpenIB > Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 3/7 V2] osm: QoS policy > C & H files > > On 8/28/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Also, there was a previous question on the list on IPoIB CM > > > > > > relative to QoS which I either missed the answer to or was > > > > > > left unanswered: > > > > > > How is IPoIB CM dealt with in terms of QoS ? Is it > like IPoIB UD ? > > > > > IPoIB CM uses a specific ServiceID. > > > > > > > > Isn't it a range of Service IDs ? > > > > Yes. Service ID includes the UD QPN. > > Given the limited predictability of the QPN, this would need > to be reflected in the QoS policy when specifying ServiceIDs > for IPoIB CM. > > > > > > It uses CMA so it does not need any change... > > > > > > > > Doesn't it use CM rather than CMA ? > > > > Yes. > > > > > For more detailed info need to ask MST... > > > > It's all in the spec, really. > > but I don't think that includes how it relates to QoS and > specifically the QoS policy being used by OpenSM. My point > was that the original defining document for OpenSM QoS policy > needs to be updated as I suspect it will be a source document > going forward that should be placed in the management git tree. > > -- Hal > > > -- > > MST > > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
