On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:11:33PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I know some people find this approach controversial, > > but from my perspective, this is not worse than e.g. > > SDP which does not have SW checksums pretty much by design. > > This would be alot better in my mind of the option was negotiated as > part of the CM setup process. Otherwise this becomes a network wide > all or nothing kind of feature.. > > What if the RXing Linux IB side is acting as a forwarder to ethernet? > It will forward corrupt packets if this option is set, right? So this break all gateway devices? How would packets be routed with this change? _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
