>Assuming routing works, even if this means you trust the IB-Eth gateway not to >corrupt the packet, I'm looking for name that makes this clear.
I haven't had a chance to do much this week (still at the kernel summit). However, my view is that this patch is *very* dangerous and I don't like it much. But maybe if we name the option something like "enable_silent_data_corruption" that would be sufficient warning for users. - R. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
