Would it be more appropriate that I rephrase it something along the lines ...
"We will simply drop the packet and let the remote end handle the dropped
packet"
Ok - this makes more sense to me.
+ rx_ptr = priv->cm.rx_index_table[index];
+ if (unlikely(!rx_ptr)) {
+ ipoib_warn(priv, "Received packet from a connection "
+ "that is going away. Hardware will handle it.\n");
+ return;
+ }
If this check can ever succeed, then it's also possible for rx_ptr to
reference the wrong connection. rx_table[index] should not be freed
until all receives associated with that QP have been processed.
rx_index_table[index] is freed only in the stale task. So, that means
all receives have been processed by this time.
Then it sounds like we can remove this check.
- Sean
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
