Do you see anything wrong with this patch? <linux/scatterlist.h> includes <asm/scatterlist.h> so the extra include of <asm/scatterlist.h> is not needed, and I don't see anything that seems like it would want <asm/io.h> (and my test builds on x86-64, ia64, powerpc, i386 and alpha all pass without the include).
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c index 9ea5b9a..a6f2303 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/mm.h> -#include <asm/io.h> -#include <asm/scatterlist.h> #include <linux/scatterlist.h> #include <linux/kfifo.h> #include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c index 36cdf77..e05690e 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c @@ -36,8 +36,6 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/highmem.h> -#include <asm/io.h> -#include <asm/scatterlist.h> #include <linux/scatterlist.h> #include "iscsi_iser.h" diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c index d42ec01..654a4dc 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ * * $Id: iser_verbs.c 7051 2006-05-10 12:29:11Z ogerlitz $ */ -#include <asm/io.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/delay.h> _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
