Roland Dreier wrote:
 > So indeed the assumption in the patch is that mgids which translate to
 > legal IP multicast addresses are inserted into the database either by
 > ipoib or rdma-cm consumers who use IPOIB_PS for their ID's.

I guess since it's confiruable, it's OK.  But I think that you miss
the fact that there might be other consumers of ib_sa creating
multicast groups, and there might be other rdma_cm consumers using
IPOIB_PS also.

I understand that there may be other ib_sa consumers that use multicast and other rdma_cm consumers that use IPOIB_PS, however, the point I was trying to make is that if there are consumers that join the --same-- multicast groups as ipoib they can actually avoid ipoib to join these group if they provide different attributes for the group.

This is why Sean made the rdma_cm to use the --same-- attributes as ipoib does for IPOIB_PS joins. For other joins the rdma-cm makes sure that the MGID is different (rdma-cm signature instead of the ipv4/v6 one) and uses a different qkey.

Anyway, I understand that we are more or less on the same page regarding this point, correct?

Or.

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to