From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:34:50 -0400
> The brain-block i am having is the parallelization aspect of it. > Whatever scheme it is - it needs to ensure the scheduler works as > expected. For example, if it was a strict prio scheduler i would expect > that whatever goes out is always high priority first and never ever > allow a low prio packet out at any time theres something high prio > needing to go out. If i have the two priorities running on two cpus, > then i cant guarantee that effect. > IOW, i see the scheduler/qdisc level as not being split across parallel > cpus. Do i make any sense? Picture it like N tubes you stick packets into, and the tubes are processed using DRR. So packets within a tube won't be reordered, but reordering amongst tubes is definitely possible. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
