On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 00:00 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote: > >might be of value to document somewhere that the initiator depth and > >responder resources are not directly related to the actual work queue > >depth, and that without some sort of intervention, are not that high. > > FYI - I am currently updating the librdmacm man pages based on your other > e-mail. I will make sure to document these values. > > >This leads one to believe that the values are OK, even though they fail > >when you use the same values in rdma_accept. A note to this effect in > >the man pages would help. > > I will at least note how to obtain the correct maximum for local > responder_resources by querying the local HCA. The correct setting for > initiator_depth needs to come from the remote endpoint.
Works for Me (TM)
> Please continue to let me know what other problems you run into. I'd like to
> address as many issues as possible for the next release. (New features will
> be
> pushed out some.)
Will do.
--
Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Infiniband specific RPMs available at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
