3)  The man pages on rdma_connect() and rdma_accept() aren't really
clear on the role of the connection parameters struct that gets passed
in.  Specifically, it doesn't say whether or not the initiator_depth and
responder_resources in the parm struct present in the listen event are
what the other side set, or if they are already swapped to indicate the
minimum/maximum that we can set on our side of the connection.  Also,

I've added documentation regarding initiator_depth and responder_resources, plus fully defined the data carried in rdma_cm_event.

the initial message pointer is not detailed.  When we call
rdma_accept/rdma_reject, does our parm struct need to have that same
pointer?  Do we need to free that mem?  Can we supply a new initial
message and not leak the memory associated with the incoming initial
message?

Can you clarify what message you're referring to? My assumption is rdma_cm_event, but I want to make sure.

I should have the documentation updates available for review later today or tomorrow.

- Sean
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to