On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 20:25 +0200, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 07:37 Sun 21 Oct , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > > > > > > is temporary limitation (like > > > > > all port simulation for single port CAs only), right? > > > > > > > > Temporary in the sense that it can be fixed but I have no current plan > > > > to do so as I am unaware of any practical need for this. > > > > > > Probably it would be better to have cleaner error message then - > > > something like "non-CA nodes are not supported yet." > > > > To be more precise, it would be "Only single port CAs currently > > supported". Feel free to change the message if you want. > > > > > > Are you aware of such a need ? > > > > > > Yes, assuming "all ports" queries are useful. > > > > Can you be more specific as to where ? Greg's email was the only > > indication of where this was needed. > > perfquery is generic utility. Isn't it? Assumig it is we should cover > general usage case and not just specifics.
As I said, I have no current plan for this. You are welcome to fix the general case if you think it is important now. -- Hal > > Sasha > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
