> Yes, I saw that and fixed it.  Actually I finished rewriting things so
> that there is no more index and no static table any more.  I haven't
> posted the patches yet because I wanted to read it over a little more,
> but if you re-pull my for-2.6.25 branch you will get them.
> 

Quick update: I made several iterations with both slab and slub caches (and 
combinations). Saw one instance of BUG_ON(slabp->inuse < 0 || slabp->inuse >= 
cachep->num); 
in cache_alloc_refill(). This was the first run wherein both the client and
server were the latest from your for-2.6.25 tree. After that I could not
reproduce this crash in many runs. I am not sure, what I should make of it.

So, I guess it looks OK. I might have a few questions, however that is a
separate issue. I will follow up on that separately.

Pradeep

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to