Hi Yevgeny,

On 14:15 Sun 02 Dec     , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Comparison for IB_LR_COMPMASK_FROM_LID/IB_LR_COMPMASK_TO_LID
> component mask bits was missing in LinkRecord processing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  opensm/opensm/osm_sa_link_record.c |   13 +++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_link_record.c 
> b/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_link_record.c
> index ba52aea..0970ad7 100644
> --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_link_record.c
> +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_link_record.c
> @@ -256,6 +256,17 @@ __osm_lr_rcv_get_physp_link(IN osm_lr_rcv_t * const 
> p_rcv,
>               if (dest_port_num != p_lr->to_port_num)
>                       goto Exit;
> 
> +     __get_base_lid(p_src_physp, &from_base_lid);
> +     __get_base_lid(p_dest_physp, &to_base_lid);
> +
> +     if (comp_mask & IB_LR_COMPMASK_FROM_LID)
> +             if (from_base_lid != p_lr->from_lid)
> +                     goto Exit;
> +
> +     if (comp_mask & IB_LR_COMPMASK_TO_LID)
> +             if (to_base_lid != p_lr->to_lid)
> +                     goto Exit;

Would this be correct LMC > 0? As far as I understand aliased (not based)
LIDs can be used in a query.

Sasha

> +
>       if (osm_log_is_active(p_rcv->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG))
>               osm_log(p_rcv->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
>                       "__osm_lr_rcv_get_physp_link: "
> @@ -267,8 +278,6 @@ __osm_lr_rcv_get_physp_link(IN osm_lr_rcv_t * const p_rcv,
>                       cl_ntoh64(osm_physp_get_port_guid(p_dest_physp)),
>                       dest_port_num);
> 
> -     __get_base_lid(p_src_physp, &from_base_lid);
> -     __get_base_lid(p_dest_physp, &to_base_lid);
> 
>       __osm_lr_rcv_build_physp_link(p_rcv, from_base_lid,
>                                     to_base_lid, src_port_num,
> -- 
> 1.5.1.4
> 
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to