On 12/6/07, Vu Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The question on usage case of bonding over separate fabrics have been > > brought to me several times and I gave this answer, no-one ever tried > > to educate me why its interesting, maybe you will do so... > > > > I don't have good reason. I used two separated fabrics configuration > because my lacking understanding on ethernet/ib bonding and the old > methodology way of redundancy in ethernet & FC using two separated fabrics.
Yes, that was my guess, but, my hope was that you can provide some reasoning for thismethodology way of redundancy which I understand you were using also for SRP HA, so can you say anything in favor of the way you were working till now? As I said, this problem of failure in one side enforcing a failure in the other side, and worse, when there are more than two players, eg one target and N initiators, fail-over in one initiator forces the target to fail-over --> forces the other N-1 initiators to fail-over!? Or. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
