If a heavy sweep requested during idle queue processing, OSM continues
to process it till the end and only then notices the heavy sweep request.
In some cases this might leave a topology change unhandled for several
minutes.
Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c
index 5c39f11..6ee5ee6 100644
--- a/opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c
+++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c
@@ -1607,13 +1607,30 @@ void osm_state_mgr_process(IN osm_state_mgr_t * const
p_mgr,
/* CALL the done function */
__process_idle_time_queue_done(p_mgr);
- /*
- * Set the signal to
OSM_SIGNAL_IDLE_TIME_PROCESS
- * so that the next element in the queue gets
processed
- */
-
- signal = OSM_SIGNAL_IDLE_TIME_PROCESS;
- p_mgr->state = OSM_SM_STATE_PROCESS_REQUEST;
+ if (p_mgr->p_subn->force_immediate_heavy_sweep)
{
+ /*
+ * Do not read next item from the idle
queue.
+ * Immediate heavy sweep is requested,
so it's
+ * more important.
+ * Besides, there is a chance that
after the
+ * heavy sweep complition, idle queue
processing
+ * that SM would have performed here
will be obsolete.
+ */
+ if (osm_log_is_active(p_mgr->p_log,
OSM_LOG_DEBUG))
+ osm_log(p_mgr->p_log,
OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
+ "osm_state_mgr_process: "
+ "interrupting idle time queue
processing - heavy sweep requested\n");
+ signal = OSM_SIGNAL_NONE;
+ p_mgr->state = OSM_SM_STATE_IDLE;
+ }
+ else {
+ /*
+ * Set the signal to
OSM_SIGNAL_IDLE_TIME_PROCESS
+ * so that the next element in the
queue gets processed
+ */
+ signal = OSM_SIGNAL_IDLE_TIME_PROCESS;
+ p_mgr->state =
OSM_SM_STATE_PROCESS_REQUEST;
+ }
break;
default:
--
1.5.1.4
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general