On 16:41 Tue 18 Dec , Al Chu wrote: > Hey Sasha, > > Here's the first patch in my set of patches to fix the incorrect routing > engine reporting problem described in the earlier thread (thread: [PATCH > 2/3] OpenSM: Fix incorrect reporting of routing engine/algorithm used). > It's been redone as discussed in the thread. > > This patch 1/3 just defines the enumeration of routing engine types, a > few functions for mapping between enums and strings, and sticks a value > into osm_opensm_t for tracking the routing engine. The only interesting > thing to note is due to current implementation, the function > osm_routing_engine_type() considers a NULL pointer and the string "null" > to mean that the minhop algorithm was specified. > > Thanks, > Al > > -- > Albert Chu > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 925-422-5311 > Computer Scientist > High Performance Systems Division > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
> From 2b8ffc06d734d3da9e5e5abba766548052aac923 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Albert L. Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:47:31 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] support osm_routing_engine_type_t enumeration > > > Signed-off-by: Albert L. Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied. Thanks. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
