On 08:39 Thu 27 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 16:35 +0000, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > > Hi Yevgeny, > > > > On 17:39 Thu 27 Dec , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote: > > > Turning on inbound partition enforcement bit on switch ports - > > > undoing part of the changes that were done by the previous pkey patch. > > > > It looks like full revert, is it what did you mean? > > > > As far as I understand Hal's point was different - to set *full* P_Key > > values on switch's ports > > That was before I looked up o18-14. > > > (and revert original patch). Not quite sure it > > is the best option - IMO it doesn't enforce limited-to-limited > > communication at nearest switch port and breaks limited-to-limited > > enforcement on outbound ports. However I don't see an ideal solution > > here. > > After reading o18-14, do you still think so ?
No (after reading this up to the last line :)) Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
