On 08:20 Thu 27 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 16:13 +0000, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > > Hi Hal, > > > > On 07:00 Thu 27 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 14:29 +0200, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote: > > > > Fixing wrong setting of partition enforcement bits on switch ports. > > > > When an HCA port is configured with a certain pkey, the peer port > > > > on the switch should turn on outbound partition enforcement bit only. > > > > Turning on the inbound enforcement will cause the switch to drop > > > > valid packets if the HCA is partial member. > > > > > > Inbound enforcement is actually the more useful case. If there is > > > inbound enforcement, outbound enforcement doesn't add much. > > > > > > In the case of partial only (not both partial and full) membership, the > > > peer switch physical port would need to be set to full membership. > > > > Then it could break outbound enforcement. Isn't it? > > What I wrote was wrong. Limited pkey is sufficient. See o18-14
Do you mean last paragraph of o18-14? Assuming so - it makes sense. So we need just revert the original patch. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
