Hi Hal, On 09:15 Thu 27 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > There were other patches I supplied, etc. I don't think it was just the > outstanding counter fix but others too.
I may be wrong about it, but I don't remember this now. If you like me to review those patches again, let's review. > > > I can dig out the emails if this is really needed. > > > > > > > I don't backport non critical fixes and improvements from master to 1.2 > > > > - that is true. > > > > > > There were a number of fixes originally supplied for 1.2 up ported to > > > 1.3. Guess you could always consider them non critical although I would > > > beg to differ on some of those. > > > > Always - no, but in general I prefer to run master in the field. > > Not everyone has that luxury (and master has not even shipped as 1.3 > yet). The recent OpenSM (and management) versions are available as tarballs and/or from the git repo. > I tried to get this changed but seems no one else shares this > issue. As I said before, the implication of this is that 1.2 is not > officially supported based on this policy (although there are fixes > going into 1.2 as 1.2.5 is still "live"). There should not be connection between "this policy" and the official OFED 1.2 support which is provided by software/hardware vendors. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
