> In the majority of cases, if the neighbour will change, it will > be reflected in the guid part of the GID (bytes 8-15). If the GID > prefix will change as well (bytes 0-7) it will be because the master > SM has changed, in which case we will get an SM change event resulting > in all paths flushed.
Is it guaranteed that an active SM can't change a GID prefix? Especially if we're using a GID at an index != 0? In other words, is this change definitely 100 percent safe? Also I assume this change is coming from performance tuning. For patches like this it is always helpful to include hard data like "this gives a speedup of X on test Y on system Z." Thanks... _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
