On 08:32 Tue 08 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 16:38 +0000, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > > On 07:57 Tue 08 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > > Also, ib_cm_types.h looks like it should be changed as well in terms > > > > > of > > > > > this. > > > > > > > > This file seems to be unused at all, likely we could just remove it. > > > > > > This was done for an out of tree consumer a while ago (those definitions > > > were originally in ib_types.h). There was a thread on general a while > > > ago on this and I think a closed bug too. I can dig it out if you can't. > > > > I remember at least discussion in bag tracker. So what is you opinion? > > I would do the same thing here as being done with ib_types.h (and remove > the WIN declarations) assuming no objections on this in general (e.g. on > ib_types.h). > > > Are you against removing? > > Yes.
Why? Does anybody this file? Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
