>>>>> "sashak" == Sasha Khapyorsky writes: sashak> I suspect that the failure scenario is different. This switch sashak> was just connected/discovered by OpenSM (it has hops = 0x0 sashak> yet - this indicates that it does not pass lid matrix sashak> generation stage yet) and it still be uninitialized by sashak> LASH. If it is really so checking ->priv for NULL looks like sashak> valid fix.
Should opensm ignore requests while it's initializing? sashak> Is this reproducible failure? We've hit it twice - first time cores were disabled, so I only know what opensm died in get_lash_id() but I don't know where it was called from. And this is the second time. It does not happen on each restart or fabric re-scan though. max _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
