On 09:47 Mon 14 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 09:26 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote: > > >This returns value of pkey_index in network byte order from user_mad > > > > Why would you return an index in network byte order? > > Looking at the code, I think the description is wrong in terms of that > and should remove the words "in network byte order" but the code looks > right to me. In fact, it appears with new_user_api in umad_set_pkey that > there was a bug (in the existing code) in that pkey_index was converted > to network order.
Right, there was a bug there. And agree about wrong patch description, I will change it. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
