Can I surmise from all this benchmarking of the ib_srpt module that this is now stable? Last I checked the git version still had a data corruption bug.
I saw some patches submitted to fix this, but the OFED git repository (http://www.openfabrics.org/git/~vu/srpt.git) shows no recent commits. With all these impressive numbers, I am eager to see SRPT/SCST performance in the WinOF srp initiator environment using database loads. Props to Vu and Vlad for this outstanding storage transport! On Jan 24, 2008 8:06 AM, Robin Humble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:32:08PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > > >....................................................................... ...................... > >. . STGT read SCST read . STGT read SCST read . > >. . performance performance . performance performance . > >. . (0.5K, MB/s) (0.5K, MB/s) . (1 MB >MB/s) (1 MB, MB/s) . > >....................................................................... ...................... > >. Ethernet (1 Gb/s network) . 77 78 . 77 89 . > >. IPoIB (8 Gb/s network) . 163 185 . 201 239 . > >. iSER (8 Gb/s network) . 250 N/A . 360 N/A . > >. SRP (8 Gb/s network) . N/A 421 . N/A 683 . > >..................................................................... > >....................... > Results with /dev/ram0 configured as backing store on the target (buffered I/O): Read Write Read Write performance performance performance performance (0.5K, MB/s) (0.5K, MB/s) (1 MB, MB/s) (1 MB, MB/s) STGT + iSER 250 48 349 781 SCST + SRP 411 66 659 746 Results with /dev/ram0 configured as backing store on the target (direct I/O): Read Write Read Write performance performance performance performance (0.5K, MB/s) (0.5K, MB/s) (1 MB, MB/s) (1 MB, MB/s) STGT + iSER 7.9 9.8 589 647 SCST + SRP 12.3 9.7 811 794 Bart. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
