No spec issues. Just use "right" library names in dat.conf file. Thanks,
Arkady Kanevsky email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Appliance Inc. phone: 781-768-5395 1601 Trapelo Rd. - Suite 16. Fax: 781-895-1195 Waltham, MA 02451 central phone: 781-768-5300 > -----Original Message----- > From: James Lentini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 3:38 PM > To: Arlin Davis; Kanevsky, Arkady > Cc: Doug Ledford; general > Subject: Re: Dapl 2 question/issue > > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Arlin Davis wrote: > > > Doug Ledford wrote: > > > OK, I've been working on integrating the latest dapl > stuff into our > > > RHEL5.2 product and I've come across what I think is an issue. > > > > > > The dapl-2 code is not compatible with dapl-1 code, and > there is a > > > (albeit small, but still it exists) amount of work to > forward port code. > > > However, you maintained the same library name (aka, > libdat) for both > > > dapl-1 and dapl-2. > > > > Yes, I wanted to stay away from renaming on every major > release if possible. > > But I can see your point if someone wants v1 and v2 development > > packages on the same system. The intention was to provide only the > > latest development environment with older versions > supported in libraries only. > > > > That means that, if code were to #include > > > <dat/dat.h> and then link against -ldat, they would get the old > > > dapl-1 headers and the new dapl-2 library (assuming the dapl-1 > > > headers are installed, which realistically they need to > be until all > > > dependent code has been forward ported to dapl-2). In order for > > > dapl-1 and dapl-2 libraries and devel environments to be > installed > > > simultaneously, which is what you need for a seamless > migration from > > > version 1 to 2, you need different names on the libs. Is > there any > > > chance we can get an updated > > > dapl-2 that actually changes the lib name to libdat2.so > instead of > > > just libdat.so? > > > > I have no objections to libdat2.so. > > > > James, do you see any issues? Anyone else? > > I don't have any objections either. > > Arkady, are there any spec. issues? > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
