Shirley Ma wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 09:04 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
I see, but I want to make sure these patches are the one you want to merge into the kernel or its more of a work in progress which you want to be included in this experimental testbed called ofed.
I will create patch for OFED-1.3-RC3 separately. I wouldn't call it's experimental code since these APIs have been tested along with IPoIB-CM already. They are pretty stable.
I meant to say that ofed is an experimental testbed, this is becoming more and more clear to more and more people. I did not address your patchset specifically.
If its candidate for upstream inclusion, I find it hard to review since there is no per patch change-log.
Thanks for the advice, I thought one change log was enough. If not, I will resubmit these patches along with one ling change-log.
If you think that for each of the patch one line change log is enough for a reviewer, let it be, but if I were you, I would validate again this assumption. The things is that when you send an RFC, many times most of the documentation is in the virtual 0/N patch, but remember that this documentation does not go into the git change-log, so in your case since you want this to be merged, you have to work harder and document both in the 0/N and also in the 1/N, 2/N ... N/N postings.
Or _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
