Hello Tziporet, On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 18:56 +0200, Tziporet Koren wrote: > Shirley Ma wrote: > > > > Hello Tziporet, > > > > The problem was because of the last check in of small UDP performance > > patch. It changed the receiving path completely. And I only got less > > than one day to merge/test the patch with that patch on both intel and > > PPC platform. The patch was in good/stable shape before this patch. It > > has passed stress test for both intel and PPC platform. I have tested > > the whole night of the new patch yesterday night. It works well and > > passes the stress test without any problem. > > > Which OS have you tested?
2.6.24 kernel, and I am going to test SLES10SP2 kernel. It has passed stress test the whole night for 2K MTU test suites. > > Regarding Eli's comments, I have sent out. I am sorry for the minor > > mistake because of the rushing, but I don't see any risk from my test > > results. Please reconsider this patch to be in OFED-1.3. > > > OK - we will do this - we will run one set of our regression with your > patch now, and also check that it pass compilation on all kernels. > If both will be OK we will take it. > > I cross fingers for you :-) > > ziporet Appreciate you, Vlad and Eli's help here! There is one line change needed for backporting ++priv->stats and ++dev->stats. I didn't create the backport patch for this. thanks Shirley _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
