On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 09:00 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote: > >Saying all that, I don't think we want to have --any RNR retries--, as > >for retries, I am open to hear what others think. > > I'm really not all that familiar with ipoib protocol, but if it's being > implemented over an RC connection, then adding an RNR retry seems to make > sense > to me. I believe using UC is better, but if it's over RC, I don't know that > we > want to take the hit of tearing down and re-establishing the connection just > because we have a fast sender. (This is just an opinion based on no fact > whatsoever.) > > - Sean
Did anyone ever run IPoIB-CM (multiple sockets and multiple connections) between ipath and mthca or connectX and mthca? I guess there might be a similar issue there, mismatched send rates. thanks Shirley _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
