On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:02:49 +0200 Yevgeny Kliteynik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > > Hi Ira, > > > > On 14:02 Wed 20 Feb , Ira Weiny wrote: > >> I actually hit these when I was testing with a low OSM_UMAD_MAX_PENDING > >> value. > >> I was a bit unsure of what to do in these cases if p_physp was NULL. What > >> I do > >> in this patch seems reasonable as the fabric does route but perhaps you > >> could > >> double check me? > > > > The patch looks correct for me. And seems I need to review all > > osm_node_get_physp_ptr() usages again. > > > >> From 310a6cceca946fcc86f7bec28dfdeba77d011fc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: Ira K. Weiny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:53:51 -0800 > >> Subject: [PATCH] Fix 2 potential core dumps now that > >> osm_node_get_physp_ptr can return NULL > >> > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ira K. Weiny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Applied. Thanks. > > Is this applicable to ofed_1_3 as well? No, osm_node_get_physp_ptr does not return NULL in ofed_1_3. Ira > > -- Yevgeny > > > Sasha > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > To unsubscribe, please visit > > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
