On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> > Seems the consensus is that when you return from post_recv() the buffer > can be assumed to be available for incoming SEND placement... > > I don't think any other solution could even work for SRQs. Applications cannot be required to advertise the credit on the "same" QP after posting to the SRQ. And requiring that credit be advertised on a per-connection basis would be contrary to the goal of allowing SRQs to be used as a common pool for multiple connection sessions. _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
