On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Yes, that's why I kept maintaining my patch and I posted the last > revision to Andrew. I use pte/tlb locking of the core VM, it's > unintrusive and obviously safe. Furthermore it can be extended with > Christoph's stuff in a 100% backwards compatible fashion later if needed.
How would that work? You rely on the pte locking. Thus calls are all in an atomic context. I think we need a general scheme that allows sleeping when references are invalidates. Even the GRU has performance issues when using the KVM patch. _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
