On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I don't have a strong opinion if it should become a semaphore > unconditionally or only with a CONFIG_XPMEM=y. But keep in mind > preempt-rt runs quite a bit slower, or we could rip spinlocks out of > the kernel in the first place ;)
D you just skip comments of people on the mmu_notifier? It took me to remind you about Andrew's comments to note those. And I just responded on the XPmem issue in the morning. Again for the gazillionth time: There will be no CONFIG_XPMEM because the functionality needs to be generic and not XPMEM specific. _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
