Hey Hal, Are you saying a flag inside each osm_switch_t to indicate if that specific switch is balanced?
The script I wrote for the balance check did have difficulty determining a lot of corner cases (is port connected to a CA? is it active? what ports are up vs. down links, etc.). At the end of the day you just output a lot of extra info and have to look through it manually. Although probably not easy as a whole, these calculations would be easier in opensm since that information is available. Al > On 05:04 Sun 02 Mar , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 22:53 +0000, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: >> > On 19:59 Fri 29 Feb , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> > > >> > > If that makes sense, then also query commands on this "state" would >> > > likely also. >> > >> > Not sure about this. It is dynamically updated flag, so it would be >> hard >> > to catch a "valid" value by hand from the OpenSM console. >> >> I was referring to the "balance" state not that flag. Does that make >> more sense ? > > What do you mean? Routing dumps? > > Sasha > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > To unsubscribe, please visit > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > -- Albert Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 925-422-5311 Computer Scientist High Performance Systems Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
