Dotan Barak wrote:
Hi.
The fact that ibv_poll_cq failed indicates that something bad happened.
Usually this failure should create any problem and only the process
that had the problem is being
effected from this.
I personally think that the ib_* performance tools are better to check
the performance of your subnet.
**
Which programs are these?
I will be happy if you'll answer the following questions:
Is this error is consistent?
**
Yes. From this morning...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ./ibv_srq_pingpong -s 1 -n 1000
...
2000 bytes in 0.00 seconds = 3.56 Mbit/sec
1000 iters in 0.00 seconds = 4.49 usec/iter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ./ibv_srq_pingpong -s 100 -n 1000
...
200000 bytes in 0.00 seconds = 357.46 Mbit/sec
1000 iters in 0.00 seconds = 4.48 usec/iter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ./ibv_srq_pingpong -s 200 -n 1000
...
400000 bytes in 0.00 seconds = 711.74 Mbit/sec
1000 iters in 0.00 seconds = 4.50 usec/iter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ./ibv_srq_pingpong -s 500 -n 1000
...
1000000 bytes in 0.00 seconds = 1752.08 Mbit/sec
1000 iters in 0.00 seconds = 4.57 usec/iter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ./ibv_srq_pingpong -s 1000 -n 1000
...
2000000 bytes in 0.01 seconds = 2973.98 Mbit/sec
1000 iters in 0.01 seconds = 5.38 usec/iter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ./ibv_srq_pingpong -s 2000 -n 1000
...
4000000 bytes in 0.01 seconds = 5226.20 Mbit/sec
1000 iters in 0.01 seconds = 6.12 usec/iter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ./ibv_srq_pingpong -s 5000 -n 1000
...
poll CQ failed -2
Now, this used to work:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ./ibv_srq_pingpong -s 1 -n 1000
...
poll CQ failed -2
As did this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ./ibv_rc_pingpong -s 1 -n 1000
local address: LID 0x0003, QPN 0xa9004a, PSN 0x540960
remote address: LID 0x0004, QPN 0xaf004a, PSN 0x787c46
poll CQ failed -2
Can you please send me the output of the ibv_devinfo of your machines?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ./ibv_devinfo
hca_id: mlx4_0
fw_ver: 2.3.000
node_guid: 0002:c903:0000:c51c
sys_image_guid: 0002:c903:0000:c51f
vendor_id: 0x02c9
vendor_part_id: 25418
hw_ver: 0xA0
board_id: MT_04A0120002
phys_port_cnt: 2
port: 1
state: PORT_ACTIVE (4)
max_mtu: 2048 (4)
active_mtu: 2048 (4)
sm_lid: 3
port_lid: 3
port_lmc: 0x00
port: 2
state: PORT_DOWN (1)
max_mtu: 2048 (4)
active_mtu: 2048 (4)
sm_lid: 0
port_lid: 0
port_lmc: 0x00
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /usr/local/bin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ./ibv_devinfo
hca_id: mlx4_0
fw_ver: 2.3.000
node_guid: 0002:c903:0000:c474
sys_image_guid: 0002:c903:0000:c477
vendor_id: 0x02c9
vendor_part_id: 25418
hw_ver: 0xA0
board_id: MT_04A0120002
phys_port_cnt: 2
port: 1
state: PORT_ACTIVE (4)
max_mtu: 2048 (4)
active_mtu: 2048 (4)
sm_lid: 3
port_lid: 4
port_lmc: 0x00
port: 2
state: PORT_DOWN (1)
max_mtu: 2048 (4)
active_mtu: 2048 (4)
sm_lid: 0
port_lid: 0
port_lmc: 0x00
Did you have any error message in the /var/log/messages when you saw
this error?
nasnu2:/usr/local/bin# tail /var/log/messages
Mar 13 05:30:05 nasnu2 -- MARK --
Mar 13 05:50:05 nasnu2 -- MARK --
Mar 13 06:10:05 nasnu2 -- MARK --
Mar 13 06:30:05 nasnu2 -- MARK --
Mar 13 06:50:05 nasnu2 -- MARK --
Mar 13 07:10:05 nasnu2 -- MARK --
Mar 13 07:30:05 nasnu2 -- MARK --
Mar 13 07:36:09 nasnu2 syslogd 1.4.1#18: restart.
Mar 13 07:50:05 nasnu2 -- MARK --
Mar 13 08:10:05 nasnu2 -- MARK --
nasnu2:/usr/local/bin# tail /var/log/opensm.log
Mar 13 08:16:46 024587 [43806960] 0x02 -> SUBNET UP
Mar 13 08:16:56 024615 [43806960] 0x02 -> SUBNET UP
Mar 13 08:17:06 024596 [43806960] 0x02 -> SUBNET UP
Mar 13 08:17:16 024549 [43806960] 0x02 -> SUBNET UP
Mar 13 08:17:26 024664 [43806960] 0x02 -> SUBNET UP
Mar 13 08:17:36 024626 [43806960] 0x02 -> SUBNET UP
Mar 13 08:17:46 024627 [43806960] 0x02 -> SUBNET UP
Mar 13 08:17:56 024611 [43806960] 0x02 -> SUBNET UP
Mar 13 08:18:06 024607 [43806960] 0x02 -> SUBNET UP
Thanks for your help,
murray smigel
thanks
Dotan
Murray Smigel wrote:
Hi,
I am running OFED-3.0 using ConnectX adapters in a two machine direct
connect mode.
Most of the various pingpong tests seem ok, but when I run
ibv_srq_pingpong -s 500 -n 1000
I get poll "CQ failed -2" when I start up the client side. Smaller
values of -s worked fine.
Once this happens, no other pingpong tests seem to work.
I have then unloaded all the ib_* mlmx_* and iw_* modules, reloaded
them and things still
fail. I have to reboot the machines to get things back.
1) Is there a cleaner way to recover from this situation?
2) Is the initial failure an indication that something else is wrong?
3) Is the -s 1 latency I see with ibv_rc_pingpong of ~7 microseconds
reasonable?
Thanks,
murray smigel
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
