On 14:35 Thu 13 Mar , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 21:36 +0000, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > > On 07:10 Thu 13 Mar , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > > > Isn't message which states "Forcing correction to 0x0" misleading > > > > It is in sense of OpenSM internal SwitchInfo representation. > > The message is unclear and makes it seem like it is updating SwitchInfo.
Which message would be better? Would care about the patch? > > > on > > > standby and should be conditionalized for master only ? > > > > The message? Why? It should fix this value anyway. > > on the standby ? For later, if it becomes master ? Yes (although SwitchInfo should be refetched on new heavy sweep), and in general there is no reason to keep invalid data in OpenSM, so I think the warning is valid. The text itself can mislead... Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
