On 09:27 Fri 14 Mar , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > Yes but the field is present none the less (to pad out the structure to > the full MAD size so we don't get into issues there again).
ntc_144 is union field anyway, and there are no trailing padding in other ntc_xxxx. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
