On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:04:09 -0700 Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Greg, I'm fine with merging that patch through my tree. The only > > > potential problem I see is if you also have the final class_device > > > removal patch in your tree too, in which case your tree then depends > > > on my tree in an unfortunate way. > > > > I keep reverting that patch (and hope Greg will remove it from his > > linux-next series (NEXT_PATCHES_START/END hint, hint :-)) > > Sorry, I'm not able to parse the antecedent of "that" in your > sentence. Which patch are you hoping about?
The one that removes struct class_device (driver-core-remove-no-longer-used-struct-class_device.patch). Greg has agreed that that patch needs to be merged late. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgpXC2cR2D1mQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
