On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 00:41 +0000, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 11:28 Wed 26 Mar , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >
> > Because it was published as a global API and something outside might be
> > using it. It's not necessarily just for internal consumers.
>
> It was recent enough
It's been around since 11/06 (svn days) so that's several releases:
commit 77d05cd79a1cad790aa7766331dcf4f2d8bddc4e
Author: Sasha Khapyorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri Nov 3 11:55:58 2006 +0000
r10053: OpenSM: Remove obsolete p_report_buf
This removes obsolete now shared sm->p_report_buf buffer and cleans
up related code. And also introduces new log function osm_log_printf()
which currently trivially sends formatted output to stdout.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> and almost useless function so I'm very skeptical it was used anywhere.
Yes, it's trivial.
> And of course I checked publicly available places (like ibutils).
>
> If you like I can depreciate this for some period of time, but personally
> don't think it is needed for anybody.
This issue was initially the procedural issue of removing a public API
without deprecation warning for a release which is the norm.
Personally I don't care about this specific API.
-- Hal
> Sasha
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
