Or,
I am not responding directly to Arkady's question, but
aren't there some files with other licenses attached?
For example, it appears addr.c, cma.c, ib_addr.h, rdma_cm.h
and rdma_cm_ib.h -- all have the "Common Public License 1.0"
mentioned.
Are these special exceptions?
Or were they just overlooked?
Or is the idea of ONLY BSD and GPLv2 not a strict rule?
-ted
Or Gerlitz wrote:
Kanevsky, Arkady wrote:
I noticed that all files in the preambule states that the file can be
taken under GNU GPLv2 or
OpenIB BSD licence.
Should not it state OpenFabrics instead?
My understanding is that when ofa was founded it was decided to go on
this --specific-- dual license, what reasoning you see to change that?
Or.
--
Ted H. Kim
Sun Microsystems, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
222 North Sepulveda Blvd., 10th Floor (310) 341-1116
El Segundo, CA 90245 (310) 341-1120 FAX
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
