Roland Dreier wrote:
Send with invalidate should be OK. Let's see about the masked atomics stuff -- we have a ton of new verbs and I think we might want to slow down and make sure it all makes sense.
OK - will send and then we will see what will come out.
> What about the split CQ for UD mode? It's improved the IPoIB > performance for small messages significantly. Oh yeah... I'll try to get that in too.
thanks
> mlx4- we plan to send patches for the low level driver only to enable > mlx4_en. These only affect our low level driver. No problem in principle, let's see the actual patches.
Sure
> I think we should try to push for XEC in 2.6.26 since there are > already MPI implementation that use it and this ties them to use OFED > only. > Also this feature is stable and now being defined in IBTA > Not taking it causing changes between OFED and the kernel and your > libibverbs and we wish to avoid such gaps. > Is there any thing we can do to help and make it into 2.6.26? I don't have a good feeling that the user-kernel interface is well thought out, so I want to consider XRC + ehca LL stuff + new iWARP verbs and make sure we have something that makes sense for the future.
I see - but can't we figure this all for the 2.6.26 window? Tziporet _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
