> We've got an iSER implementation that was hoping to utilize SendINV, > and our conformance and interoperability tools have been waiting for > support to test.
OK, that's good. But does this code start working if we add the two patches I posted? I don't understand how you could do anything useful with the current state of things plus send w/inval for amso1100. I hope I'm not being too difficult here -- but I really would like to understand how the patches that I have are useful as they stand, without some further support for new verbs and/or MW implementations. - R. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
