This is all goodness -
I'm looking for something specific to what does and does not work with
IWARP NICs in OFED today - perhaps a matrix comparing functionality of
IB vs iWARP - so we know what not to do and or what to work around when
running over IWARP NICS.
For now - we could probably just treat them as simple NICs and run RDS
over TCP - that ought to at least work..
Steve Wise wrote:
iWARP RFCs:
5040 A Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol Specification. R. Recio,
B. Metzler, P. Culley, J. Hilland, D. Garcia. October 2007.
(Format:
TXT=142247 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
5041 Direct Data Placement over Reliable Transports. H. Shah, J.
Pinkerton, R. Recio, P. Culley. October 2007. (Format: TXT=84642
bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
5042 Direct Data Placement Protocol (DDP) / Remote Direct Memory
Access Protocol (RDMAP) Security. J. Pinkerton, E. Deleganes.
October
2007. (Format: TXT=127453 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
5043 Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Direct Data Placement
(DDP) Adaptation. C. Bestler, Ed., R. Stewart, Ed.. October 2007.
(Format: TXT=38740 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
5044 Marker PDU Aligned Framing for TCP Specification. P. Culley, U.
Elzur, R. Recio, S. Bailey, J. Carrier. October 2007. (Format:
TXT=168918 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
5045 Applicability of Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol (RDMA) and
Direct Data Placement (DDP). C. Bestler, Ed., L. Coene. October
2007.
(Format: TXT=51749 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL)
For RDMA over TCP, refer to 5040, 5041, and 5044.
iWARP Verbs:
http://www.rdmaconsortium.org/home/draft-hilland-iwarp-verbs-v1.0-RDMAC.pdf
Steve.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
