Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:56:10PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Andrea Arcangeli a écrit :
+
+static int mm_lock_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
+{
+ cond_resched();
+ if ((unsigned long)*(spinlock_t **)a <
+ (unsigned long)*(spinlock_t **)b)
+ return -1;
+ else if (a == b)
+ return 0;
+ else
+ return 1;
+}
+
This compare function looks unusual...
It should work, but sort() could be faster if the
if (a == b) test had a chance to be true eventually...
Hmm, are you saying my mm_lock_cmp won't return 0 if a==b?
You need to compare *a to *b (at least, that's what you're doing for the
< case).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
